Accountants Q&As

Q&A Related party builder: What can and can't be done

4 min read

20/05/24 08:46

Knowledge Shop’s help desk helps thousands of accountants and advisers across the country get the answers they need when they need them (want to see how the membership works? Book in a tour with the team).

Here’s a question from one of our awesome members untangling the company tax rate rules when a company receives distributions through a chain of trusts.

Note that the answer is only applicable to the question asked.

Question

I have a client with an SMSF who is looking to do some capital works improvements to a property owned by their SMSF. The client wants to engage their son who is a builder to undertake the works. The son will undertake the works on normal commercial terms.

Is the SMSF able to engage the son (being a related party) to undertake these works?

Know the answer?

There may be some scope for the SMSF to utilise the services of a related party to carry out these works. However, there are some issues to attend to.

Acquiring assets from a related party

The SMSF cannot acquire assets from a related party as section 66, SIS Act stipulates. There are some exceptions to this for listed shares, business real property, etc., but these are not relevant here.

The ATO takes the view that if the SMSF was to engage the related party builder and the builder supplies all the materials for the build, then the SMSF is actually acquiring all the materials (wood, nails, etc) from the related party and as a result, breaching section 65, SIS Act.

This view is set out in SMSFR 2010/1. It states:

If goods or materials that are insignificant in value and function are provided to an SMSF as part of a service it is the Commissioner's view that it remains the performance of a service only. If, however, goods or materials are provided to the SMSF that are not insignificant in value and function there is an acquisition of assets (being the goods or materials).

There may still be some scope for the related party builder to act an 'agent' for the SMSF when they acquire the materials required to carry out the work and then use the materials in the completion. This concept was covered in an NTLG meeting in December 2011.

The minutes from this meeting state:

Section 66 of SISA prohibits, with some exceptions, the acquisition of assets by the trustee of an SMSF from a related party of the SMSF. Consequently, if a related party builder acquires materials in their own right which are then supplied to the SMSF, this would result in a contravention of section 66.

Alternatively, where a related party only acts as an agent, arranging for the acquisition of building materials on behalf of the SMSF trustee from an unrelated vendor, and the related party at no times holds legal title to the building materials, the SMSF trustees have acquired the materials from that vendor, not the related party. Therefore, section 66 of SISA would not apply to the acquisitions.

Whether the particular arrangements under which building materials are supplied do amount to a direct acquisition by the SMSF trustee from the original suppliers, with the related party only acting as an agent, will be determined by the application of the normal laws of contract and agency to the facts of each case.

As stated in the industry suggested treatment, where there is a direct acquisition by the SMSF trustee from the original supplier it is the SMSF trustee who has the contractual obligation to pay the original supplier for those materials.

If the related party pays for building materials and invoices the SMSF either progressively (that is, at regular intervals) or at the end of the project, especially where a mark-up or profit is added, this might be indicative of the purchase of the materials by the related party in their own right and on-sale to the SMSF trustee rather than a purchase by the SMSF trustee through the related party as agent. If the related party builder claims GST input tax credits in respect of the acquisition of the building materials, this might also be indicative that the related party builder acquired the building materials as part of their business operations and then supplied these to the SMSF trustee.

In addition, if the agent has outlaid funds to acquire the materials on behalf of the SMSF, an arrangement to defer reimbursement of that amount may amount to a borrowing by the trustee in contravention of section 67 of the SISA. This is discussed in paragraphs 70 to 74 of SMSFR 2009/2: Self Managed Superannuation Funds: The meaning of 'borrow money' or 'maintain an existing borrowing of money' for the purposes of section 67 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.

Important: This answer has been prepared by Knowledge Shop Pty Ltd, ABN 90 107 532 945 (Knowledge Shop). The answer provided relates exclusively to the question as asked and should not be applied to any other situation. The answer including any material and contents represents general guidance and is not intended to be financial product advice, investment advice, tax advice, or legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Scenarios, examples, and comparisons are shown for illustrative purposes only.  Knowledge Shop has not independently verified any such data. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its fairness, accuracy, correctness, completeness or adequacy. This information is intended to assist you as part of your own advice to your client. Use of this information is your responsibility. While all care has been taken to ensure the information is correct at the time of publishing, superannuation and tax legislation can change from time to time and Knowledge Shop is not liable for any loss arising from reliance on this information, including reliance on information that is no longer current.